CARTOON characters are people too, a judge has ruled in the case of a man convicted over cartoons based on The Simpsons, in which children are shown having sex.
In the New South Wales Supreme Court today, Justice Michael Adams ruled that a fictional cartoon character was a “person” within the meaning of the relevant state and commonwealth laws.
OK, so a cartoon character is a “person”. What about cartoon animal characters? If we had pictures of Donald Duck bonking Huey, Duey and Louie would that be pedophilia, bestiality or just plain incest?
I think we are getting into ridiculous territory here.